Strategic Focus: Tying Industry Risk To Quality Management Requirements
Rain Chiang
Access this research
Access all EHSQ Corporate Leaders content with a strategic subscription or buy this single report
Need help or have a question about this report? Contact us for assistance
Executive Summary
Industries with elevated quality risks – for example, pharmaceuticals and life sciences, automotive manufacturing, and food and beverage manufacturing – are subject to stringent quality management requirements. This is due to the complexity of their operations and the potential consequences of quality failures. These sectors must comply with rigorous regulatory standards that emphasize consumer safety, operational integrity and environmental protection. With strict regulatory frameworks and regulations such as good manufacturing practice (GMP), the General Food Law Regulation (GFLR), the IATF 16949 and the ISO 26262, firms face increased pressure to ensure they have adequate controls in place to minimize quality risk. This report identifies the critical factors – namely, end-user impact, component complexity and supply chain intricacy – that shape the heightened requirements for each vertical, underscoring the necessity for robust, technology-driven quality management systems (QMS) across these industries.Why do some industries have more stringent quality regulations than others?
Pharmaceutical and life sciences firms face strict product-related regulatory requirements
Automotive manufacturing is subject to tough requirements due to the critical importance of safety
Food and beverage firms fall under a range of global risk regulatory framework requirements
About the Authors
Bill Pennington
VP Research
Bill is VP Research at Verdantix, where he leads analysis on the evolving and interconnected landscapes of EHS, quality, AI and enterprise risk management. His research helps ...
View ProfileRain Chiang
Industry Analyst
Rain is an Industry Analyst in the Verdantix EHSQ practice. His current research agenda focuses on the intersection between EHSQ and ESG priorities. Prior to joining Verd...
Other related content
In August 2025, Verdantix published its latest edition of the EHS global corporate survey. This report collates details on the EHS spending, priorities and technological preferen...
29 September, 2025
Our research shows that field service leaders face three critical roadblocks to a superior customer experience: inefficient legacy systems, data silos, and insufficient technolo...
Upcoming / 23 October, 2025
In a recent Verdantix survey, 80% of EHS leaders ranked reducing Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIFs) as a top priority, with 42% identifying it as their single most important go...
Upcoming / 21 October, 2025
As attention shifts away from net zero target setting to asset level decarbonization, many firms are discovering critical disconnect between their energy management efforts and cor...
24 September, 2025
Supply chains are under increasingly strain to operate with resilience, compliance, and sustainability amidst global geopolitical turbulence. Quality management tools are a critica...
22 September, 2025
The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) – one of the most influential pieces of ESG regulation – identifies four key types of physical climate risks to businesse...
30 July, 2025