Strategic Focus: A Maturity Model For Corporate Climate Risk Management

Access this research

Access all Net Zero & Climate Risk content with a strategic subscription or buy this single report

Buy Subscription

Need help or have a question about this report? Contact us for assistance

Executive Summary

This report presents a climate risk maturity model that firms can use to benchmark their climate strategy and identify how to advance climate risk management. The model defines four levels of maturity across eight climate risk management activities: 1) climate crisis management and business continuity; 2) reporting and disclosures; 3) internal stakeholder engagement; 4) planning; 5) benchmarking; 6) implementation; 7) monitoring; and 8) due diligence. For each activity, the model provides criteria to evaluate maturity, with relevant supporting actions.

Table of contents

Firms lack clear direction on climate risk management
The model is based on prior Verdantix analysis and new desk research into the climate risk market
Advancing through four levels of climate risk maturity provides value to firms
Assessing maturity across eight climate risk management activities
Climate crisis management and business continuity
Reporting and disclosures
Internal stakeholder engagement
Planning
Benchmarking
Implementation
Monitoring
Due diligence

Table of figures

Figure 1. The maturity model answers questions for vendors and buyers of climate risk solutions
Figure 2. Evidence used to define digitization potential, and interpretation for climate risk management actions
Figure 3. Four levels of climate risk maturity
Figure 4. Summary of processes and outcomes defining four levels of maturity across eight climate risk management activities
Figure 5. Climate crisis management and business continuity maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 6. Actions supporting climate crisis management and business continuity
Figure 7. Reporting and disclosures maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 8. Actions supporting reporting and disclosures
Figure 9. Internal stakeholder engagement maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 10. Actions supporting internal stakeholder engagement
Figure 11. Planning maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 12. Actions supporting planning
Figure 13. Benchmarking maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 14. Actions supporting benchmarking
Figure 15. Implementation maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 16. Actions supporting implementation
Figure 17. Monitoring maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 18. Actions supporting monitoring
Figure 19. Due diligence maturity evaluation criteria
Figure 20. Actions supporting due diligence

About the authors

Emma Cutler

Senior Analyst
Emma is a Senior Analyst in the Verdantix Net Zero & Climate Risk practice. Her current research agenda focuses on physical and transition climate risk, climate resilience and adaptation. She has a background in simulation and statistical modelling applied to climate adaptation, coastal management and international development. She holds a PhD in Systems Engineering from Dartmouth College and a BA in Mathematics and Environmental Studies from Bowdoin College.

Ryan Skinner

Research Director, Net Zero & Climate Risk
Ryan is the Research Director for the Verdantix Net Zero & Climate Risk practice. He guides the research team to develop compelling research at the intersection of net zero strategies, carbon management, climate risk and technology. Prior to joining Verdantix, Ryan was a principal analyst at Forrester Research, where he initiated the research into ESG data and analytics offerings. He also has extensive experience of helping software companies with their messaging, positioning, market and technology strategies. Ryan studied at Duke University, the University of Manchester and the University of Oslo, and speaks Norwegian fluently.

Related Reports

Not a Verdantix client yet?

Register with Verdantix for authoritative data, analysis and advice to allow your business to succeed.