Strategic Focus: ESG & Sustainability In The US
Access this research
Access all ESG & Sustainability content with a strategic subscription or buy this single report
Buy now $2422.00
Buy Subscription
Need help or have a question about this report? Contact us for assistance
Executive Summary
The 2024 election results ushered in a new political era in the US, with Republicans winning the presidency and both houses in Congress. With significant influence over the legislative and executive branches, the Trump administration has moved rapidly to reshape several federal policies. Many of these shifts – such as eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and reducing incentives for renewable energy – will directly affect firms’ sustainability efforts, while others – such as the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), changes in immigration policy and increased tariffs – will have broader impacts. Since the presidential inauguration in January 2025, President Trump has signed a flurry of Executive Orders (EOs); the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reversed course on its climate disclosure requirements; and states have taken action where the federal government has not. This report examines the administration’s early actions related to sustainability and offers insights on how firms can adapt in this shifting environment.
Table of contents
Summary for decision-makersUncertainty forms the backdrop to sustainability and climate disclosures in the US
The effects of the 2024 election were felt immediately
States will lead on climate-related disclosures, starting with California
Firms must navigate a fragmented landscape of other sustainability regulations at the state and federal levels
Businesses should not lose sight of sustainability goals
Table of figures
Figure 1. How President Trump acted on certain sustainability-related issues in his first six weeksFigure 2. Examples of EOs issued by President Trump (January 20 to March 10, 2025)
Figure 3. Examples of directives from federal agencies (January 20 to March 10, 2025)
Figure 4. Key differences between the initial and consolidated California climate disclosure legislation
Figure 5. Comparison of the major state-led climate-related disclosure frameworks
Organisations mentioned
Advocate Aurora Health, Anheuser-Busch, Army Corps of Engineers, Booz Allen, California Air Resources Board (CARB), Carrier, Chamber of Commerce, Chevron, Citigroup, Climate Mayors, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Department of the Interior (DOI), Department of Transportation (DOT), Duke Energy, Enbridge, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Reserve Board, FedEx, Forest Service, Ingredion, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Johns Hopkins University, Kinder Morgan, NASDAQ, National Energy Dominance Council, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Net Zero Industrial Policy Lab, Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), New York State Senate, New York University (NYU) Stern School of Business, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), PepsiCo, Pleiades Strategy, Prysmian, Qualcomm, Ropes & Gray, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Shell, Supreme Court of the United States, The National Law Review, The Walt Disney Company, Tracera (formerly ESG Flo), UN, UPS, US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US District Court for Central District of California, US House of Representatives, US Senate, VISAAbout the authors
Related Reports
Not a Verdantix client yet?
Register with Verdantix for authoritative data, analysis and advice to allow your business to succeed.