EHS Software Benchmark: Environment & Sustainability Management
09 Mar, 2021
Access this research
Access all EHS Software & Services content with a strategic subscription or buy this single report
Need help or have a question about this report? Contact us for assistance
Executive Summary
This report contains an extract of the Verdantix analysis originally produced in the 2021 edition of the Verdantix Green Quadrant for environment, health and safety (EHS) software (see Verdantix Green Quadrant: EHS Software 2021). To help senior EHS executives identify the best-fit software, this benchmark provides a detailed analysis of capabilities available from assessed vendors across 99 environmental compliance and sustainability management assessment criteria. This report finds that four software vendors — Sphera, Enablon, Cority and Intelex — offer the most comprehensive functionality to facilitate environmental compliance foundations and sustainability reporting management. To ensure maximum benefits, buyers should involve sustainability functional colleagues in the selection, evaluation and adoption of EHS software solutions.
Analysing EHS Software Vendors For Their Environment And Sustainability Capabilities
Four Factors Drive Buyers To Focus On Environment And Sustainability Data Software
Assessment Criteria For Environment Management And Sustainability Reporting
Depth Of Functionality For Environmental Compliance Varies By Vendor
Depth of Functionality For Sustainability Reporting Is Led By Sphera And Enablon
Buyers Should Consider Sphera, Enablon, Cority And Intelex For Environment And Sustainability Management
Four Factors Drive Buyers To Focus On Environment And Sustainability Data Software
Assessment Criteria For Environment Management And Sustainability Reporting
Depth Of Functionality For Environmental Compliance Varies By Vendor
Depth of Functionality For Sustainability Reporting Is Led By Sphera And Enablon
Buyers Should Consider Sphera, Enablon, Cority And Intelex For Environment And Sustainability Management
Figure 1. Environment Management Functionality Scores
Figure 2. Sustainability Management Functionality Scores
Figure 3. Environment Management Percentage Of Potential Maximum Score
Figure 4. Sustainability Management Percentage Of Potential Maximum Score
Figure 5. Aggregate Environment And Sustainability Management Percentage Of Potential Maximum Score
Figure 2. Sustainability Management Functionality Scores
Figure 3. Environment Management Percentage Of Potential Maximum Score
Figure 4. Sustainability Management Percentage Of Potential Maximum Score
Figure 5. Aggregate Environment And Sustainability Management Percentage Of Potential Maximum Score
Quentic, Fortive, Alcumus, FLIR Systems, EY, CDP, SHE Software, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GRI, Benchmark Digital, UL, UK Defra, BASF, Wolters Kluwer, DNV GL, ISO, thinkstep, EU, France Ademe, SAP, Cority, VelocityEHS, DJSI, IsoMetrix, International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), London Stock Exchange, EcoOnline, SASB, Sphera, GRESB, Enablon, SAI Global, Dakota Software, Novelis, TenForce, Ecocion, BP, EEI, ehsAI, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), INX Software, AGA, UN, Telenor, Intelex, Enviance, TCFD, IPCC, HSI, ProcessMAP
About the Authors
Yaowen Ma
Principal Analyst
Yaowen is a Principal Analyst at Verdantix conducting research on EHS and ESG information management. His current agenda focuses on digital technologies, best practices and gr…
View Profile
Bill Pennington
VP Research
Bill is VP Research at Verdantix, where he leads analysis on the evolving and interconnected landscapes of EHS, quality, AI and enterprise risk management. His research helps …
View Profile